Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Harm Reduct J ; 19(1): 13, 2022 02 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257391

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In May 2018, St. Paul's Hospital (SPH) in Vancouver (Canada) opened an outdoor peer-led overdose prevention site (OPS) operated in partnership with Vancouver Coastal Health and RainCity Housing. At the end of 2020, the partnered OPS moved to a new location, which created a gap in service for SPH inpatients and outpatients. To address this gap, which was magnified by the COVID-19 pandemic, SPH opened a nurse-led OPS in February 2021. This paper describes the steps leading to the implementation of the nurse-led OPS, its impact, and lessons learned. METHODS: Four steps paved the way for the opening of the OPS: (1) identifying the problem, (2) seeking ethics guidance, (3) adapting policies and practices, and (4) supporting and training staff. RESULTS: The OPS is open between 10:00 and 20:00 and staffed by two nurses per shift. It is accessible to all patients including inpatients, patients in the Emergency Department, and patients attending outpatient services. Between February 1, 2021 and October 23, 2021, the OPS recorded 1612 visits for the purpose of injection, for an average weekly visit number of 42. A total of 46 overdoses were recorded in that 9-month period. Thirty-seven (80%) required administration of naloxone and 12 (26%) required a code blue response. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the unique nature of our OPS, we learned many important lessons in the process leading to the opening of the site and the months that followed. We conclude the paper with lessons learned grouped into six main categories, namely engagement, communication, access, staff education and support, data collection, and safety.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sobredosis de Droga , Canadá , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Hospitales , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Rol de la Enfermera , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
2.
CMAJ ; 194(16): E587-E589, 2022 04 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1808586
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(8): 1666-1670, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-603644

RESUMEN

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, principles from both clinical and public health ethics cue clinicians and healthcare administrators to plan alternatives for frail older adults who prefer to avoid critical care, and for when critical care is not available due to crisis triaging. This article will explore the COVID-19 Ethical Decision Making Framework, published in British Columbia (BC), Canada, to familiarize clinicians and policy makers with how ethical principles can guide systems change, in the service of frail older adults. In BC, the healthcare system has launched resources to support clinicians in proactive advance care planning discussions, and is providing enhanced supportive and palliative care options to residents of long-term care facilities. If the pandemic truly overwhelms the healthcare system, frailty, but not age alone, provides a fair and evidence-based means of triaging patients for critical care and could be included into ventilator allocation frameworks. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1666-1670, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Geriatría/ética , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/ética , Pandemias/ética , Salud Pública/ética , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/ética , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , Colombia Británica , COVID-19 , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/ética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Femenino , Fragilidad/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA